MINUTES OF MEETING
AMELIA WALK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Amelia Walk Community Development District was held Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at the Amelia Walk Amenity Center, 85287 Majestic Walk Boulevard, Fernandina Beach, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Gregg Kern Mike Harbison Jeff Robinson
Henry "Red" Jentz Also present were:

Chairman by telephone Vice Chai1man Supervisor
Supervisor

Daniel Laughlin Carl Eldred Dan Mccranie
Michael Molineaux Lori Conrad

District Manager
District Counsel by telephone District Engineer by telephone Evergreen Lifestyles Management Evergreen Lifestyles Management

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Laughlin called the meeting to order at 2:09 p.m. and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments
There being no comments, the next item followed.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Minutes of the March 16, 2021
Meeting
There were no comments on the minutes.

On MOTION by Mr. Harbison seconded by Mr. Robinson with all in favor the Minutes of the March 16, 2021 meeting were approved as presented.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Acceptance	of	the	Audit	Committee's
Recommendation

On MOTION by Mr. Harbison seconded by Mr. Robinson with all in favor the audit committee's recommendation to rank DMH&B the number one proposer was accepted.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINES-S	Discussion of Relocating Phase 4 CBUs
Mr. Robinson stated when I initially got the quotes, I thought there was a typo. The post office wanted to buy an additional unit for the split up and I told them we weren't going to do that, but I understand why they wanted to do that because it's somewhat difficult to put mailboxes just over on Lennar's side for the Lennar houses and another set on Richmond's because of the way the distribution works, so there is no easy way to break them  up. So, I asked for two quotes. One, which I'm calling option one, and that is to basically put all the  units in one location and that is the location adjacent to lot l 09 over on the  Richmond American side. The estimated cost there is $8,350. The process is to build the slab  and then they will coordinate with the post office. The key in this proposal is there is no rekeying or relabeling of the mailboxes. Coordinating with the post office is about a two-to-three-day disruption and that disruption is the post office comes and pulls any existing mail that is left in the mailboxes, brings it back to the post office and that is where the residents will be able  to get their mail during the period where the vendor deinstalls the units here and relocates them.
Option two is the original option where they will be split. There will be costs for the slab and the relocation is lower, approximately $3,000 lower. There is a $440 charge to relabel all the units and there is a part that is variable and is unknown. The post office will eventually decide how many boxes need to be rekeyed. It's $40 per box for estimated services and a seven-to-ten-day mail disruption. The reason why its longer is because Michael will have to recall all the keys that are out and not in the HOA's possession because they will have to be rekeyed. In my opinion it's a lot of work, plus the relabeling and rekeying of the  units. There are at least 15 to 30 mailboxes that have to be rekeyed and even if you rekey them, there will still be people asking why am I living in a Richmond American home with mailboxes there over  the  other  side. If  you  do the  math,  if they  rekey  all the  mailboxes,  it will  be close to
$12,000  total. If  they  rekey  between  40 and  60,  it will  be somewhere  between  $7,000 and
$8,000 but it's unknown, and we won't know it until we approve it. My recommendation is we go forward with option one. My goals would be putting signs up on the mailboxes.

Mr. Molineaux stated we were discussing how many mailboxes are actually occupied currently out of 176. I don't think we have more than 25 or 30. I don't have that exact number.
Mr. Robinson stated you shared this with me about a month ago and I went through there and highlighted which ones were the Richmond American and Lennar Homes and how many had been assigned. I'm sure there's been some handed out since then. The simpler approach from a logistics standpoint would be to go with what I call option one. We have the money in the budget. The other approach will be rolling the dice and it will take longer.
Mr. Harbison stated I'm unclear as to where we're moving from and too on your proposal.
Mr. Robinson stated it's in the packet. It's on Fall River Parkway next to the JEA lift
station and adjacent to lot 109.
Mr. Harbison asked and where are they now?
Mr. Robinson responded they're all here at the amenity center. In this proposal they all go in the same location. You have the sidewalk, you'd have the path and you'd have one on the end and two rows back to back.
Mr. Laughlin stated I do want to mention this would have to come out of the capital reserve funding.
Mr. Kern stated that was going to be my question. Two things just for a point of clarity
on option two. I'm not sure where these renderings or these lot layouts come from, but there is another lot where that location is being proposed. It's not showing up on this image, but presumably we're not going with that option anyway so that's a moot point but in addition to that, I think we should be responsible with the way we're funding this. Jeff, you made a comment that we have it in the budget. Can you speak more to where in the budget we have it?
Mr. Robinson responded I was looking at the bottom line for under and over from the last meeting and we seem to have quite a bit of operating and maintenance expenses under.
Mr. Laughlin stated yes. We're early in the season. Summer hasn't started yet, so that's something to consider. Also, we don't receive assessment payments from the County until December or late November so usually we have a little overage because we have to cover bills from October 1st to November or December with the previous fiscal year money.
Mr. Kern stated it's just been my experience this budget has historically operated in the surplus and I think in previous years they've been deficit funded or supplementally funded

and/or the reserve funds intended for future capital maintenance projects or improvement projects are being used to fund anything above and beyond. Daniel can correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there's a whole lot expected surplus to your point of billings coming toward  the end of the year.
Mr. Laughlin stated yes, we're usually pretty close and we have dipped into the capital reserve more than I would have liked in general in the past couple of years. Some of the big costs in a district are things like irrigation and those costs go up a lot during the summer. It is money collected from every resident in the community and there are only certain residents benefitting from this so it's just something to consider.
Mr. Jentz stated on the other hand, the residents do benefit from not having the congestion down here.
Mr. Robinson stated as well as the builders. We've spoken to all the builders and the
two which have homes in phase four saw this as a very positive move and would certainly help with their marketing efforts. Those meetings also generated other questions that I' II bring up later in the meeting.
Mr. Kem stated so just to close out, there's two ways to do it. We are either
comfortable with using reserve funds that were anticipated for other capital projects as we know that we're going to need and/or the potential if we want to maintain  those reserve funds at the levels that we're going to be open to potentially special assessments for anything that  runs over the budget. Meaning, special assessments that get disbursed across the entire community if that makes sense.
Mr. Laughlin stated that is two of the options. I would think the best could be capital, although we do have the road repairs coming up in three to five years and that's really what  that money is there for, but I would say that is the best option as opposed to a special assessment because that would involve extra costs.
Mr. Kern stated if this Board is comfortable with $8,300 for this expense to Daniel's point, I think it's debatable that it's to the benefit of all the residents. It certainly has more benefit for some, which is also debatable but maybe just to set a precedent for some of the newer board members that these are the types of decisions as we move forward, we have to be mindful that all these little projects will add up and will come to light at some point or another. The money has to come from somewhere, so it's either coming from those reserves, or in the

form of special assessments, or as an increase in the budget going into next year. Just my two cents.
Mr. Molineaux stated I have a couple of things too. Is there any proposal to break up
the existing pad once these mailboxes have been removed?
Mr. Robinson responded no, the discussion that we had was that we would look at ways to reuse those. Eventually we'd have to look at that and is something we will talk about.

On MOTION by Mr. Robinson seconded by Mr. Harbison with Mr. Jentz in favor and Mr. Kern opposed moving forward with option one for relocating the phase four mailboxes at an amount not to exceed $9,000 was approved 3-1.

Mr. Kern stated in coordinating that, I'd suggest  we meet with  the landscaper to and I'm sure Michael can help facilitate that meeting just to make sure we're not covering up irrigation heads or if they need to be moved, they can be moved and any landscape that needs to be redone around it after it's done, they should be aware of that.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion Regarding Request for Parking
Area on Fallen Leaf Drive
Mr. Laughlin stated this is a rollover item form the last meeting. We had the gentleman here and we asked him to get more information. He's not present today. I believe he was busy with another meeting, so we do not have that information. I would suggest tabling it until we do have that information.
Mr. Robinson stated the only thing I would say on that topic is that part of that
discussion, and I confirmed this with Chris last week, is there is a sidewalk portion that is not installed that is part of open space or CDD space. We should look into installing that regardless of what happens with this parking lot request to get that built out. Personally, when I looked at it while walking that neighborhood, I just assumed it was part of that lot until the houses are built and then honestly forgot about it but we definitely need to put that sidewalk in.
Mr. McCranie asked where is that?
Mr. Robinson responded Fallen Leaf, just past where the mailboxes are. There is a section between the house and where the sidewalk ends there's a gap where  there's  no sidewalk and it's CDD owned space.

Mr. McCranie stated I'll verify that versus the plans and see if the sidewalk was expected to be there and I'll get back with you.
Mr. Harbison stated this doesn't benefit parking for the mailboxes, does it?
Mr. Laughlin responded no.
Mr. Harbison stated so it's really just a private expense, and I don't think we should spend it.
Mr. Laughlin stated well like I said, we were waiting for more infonnation. When he
was here last month, he basically said the builder was going to be funding it themselves.
Mr. Robinson stated but then there's the maintenance on it.
Mr. Laughlin stated yes if we ever have to take care of it. It wouldn't be private. Anybody could park there, although I'm sure only a couple of houses would take advantage of it. We will table this and see if he is attending the next meeting and will have more information for us.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS
District Counsel

Staff Reports

Mr. Eldred stated I don't have anything specific to report this month, I just wanted to give you a quick update on the legislation that is going through session right now. Hopefully you're receiving the Capital Conversations newsletter that we send out each week. You may have noticed that there is an ethics bill that we see every year going through that could affect the operations of the District, in particular the supervisors and one of which includes a couple of limitations on continuing conflicts of interest and potential issues surrounding those ongoing conflicts that board members may have. That has passed the House, but there isn't a Senate companion to that bill. Having said that, it was sent through to the Senate and could be passed by Senate even though it doesn't have a companion bill. It's a little bit unusual in that regard, but while it is possible that it may go forward, it falls into that category of less likely than  likely so we will keep you updated on that. As the bills start to pass through the process and there's more certainty, I can give you an update on what passed and what didn't pass.

District Engineer - Requisition Summary

On MOTION by Mr. Kern seconded by Mr. Harbison with all in favor requisition number 80 was ratified.

Mr. McCranie stated I have one requisition for ratification, which is number 80 payable to McCranie & Associates for a total of $9,600. The invoice is for those services that are attached.

Mr. McCranie stated second, I have requisition number 81 to Onsight Industries, LLC for $12,725 and that is for phase five CBUs. I request approval of that requisition.

On MOTION by Mr. Robinson seconded by Mr. Jentz with all in favor requisition number 81 was approved.

District Manager
Mr. Laughlin stated I sent the Village Walk cost share numbers around that we had for any comments. We're just trying to figure out an appropriate number right now.
Mr. Robinson asked are you doing a break down with a percentage?
Mr. Laughlin responded yes, because it's just the entrance area so we had the road portion that we will be using, which will have to be maintained, entrance landscaping, irrigation and electric for that irrigation.
Mr. Harbison asked and just to be clear, those two are really one community for this purpose, right?
Mr. Laughlin responded yes; I believe so.
Mr. Robinson asked will you be having a discussion with your counterpart over there? Mr. Laughlin responded yes, from here we would just reach out to them. I believe
Gregg already spoke to them as the developer when they were first getting going and they seemed to be fine with splitting the cost. I'm not sure if they're still there or if it's changed hands at this point but we would just reach out to them and get an idea if they're comfortable with it. I think it would be important to get something because they will be using it.
Mr. Harbison asked and how long would we go back in time?
Mr. Laughlin responded it will just be moving forward. They haven't really been using it too much yet.
Mr. Harbison stated well construction ce11ainly has.

Mr. Laughlin stated yes, but it would be from the point of the agreement forward. Mr. Harbison stated so we should get it done soon.
Mr. Robinson asked we're not incurring any costs every time they tear up the sidewalk across the street to do whatever they're doing with the water, right?
Mr. Molineaux responded they're making their own repairs.
Mr. Laughlin stated if the Board is okay, I will reach out to them and see what their thoughts are on it.

Community Manager - Report
Mr. Molineaux stated we've had another stable month. We've had an issue with one of the new RV owners in phase four, Richmond American Homes, but they seem to be coming online with what they can and cannot do. We've stocked the ponds with 37,000 mosquito  fish so we will see how effective they are in the coming months. We've just basically done some routine maintenance and minor upkeep. I'm trying to get people to come out and look at our canopies. They are steel or wrought iron, or whatever they're made of. We noticed a little bit of deterioration, rusting and paint peeling. It could be that's all it is, but we have  so  far approached eight inspectors and nobody has wanted to come out and do the job, so it's just for us to keep on. We don't really want to get through the summer and hurricane  season  to find one of the canopies does indeed have metal fatigue, but that's just ongoing and I'm trying to  find somebody to come look at it. The builders on property are still selling very well, so the community is in demand.
Mr. Hartigan stated a resident who walks a lot mentioned to me that the phase four and phase five, they weren't really clear on which, but I guess maybe another area like Fallen Leaf, construction sites are much dirtier than they have been in the past. There is garbage all over them. You've probably seen that.
Mr. Molineaux stated yes, it's an ongoing challenge we have with both Lennar and
Richmond American and it's just staying on top of them.
Mr. Laughlin stated it's probably the most common complaint for me in  districts dealing with construction. Next door at Amelia Concourse they're having stuff blowing the ponds constantly, like full pieces of plywood.

Mr. Robinson stated one thing I saw on a walk in phase four and five the other day, and I was actually pleasantly surprised that with all of the Richmond American Homes they hired a lawn cutting service to cut down the weeds.
Ms. Connie Philip, 85932 Williston Court, stated we moved in March and in May termites started coming out of the ground, and then our neighbor moved in a year later when their site was done and tennites started coming out of the ground. We recognized it's because they put wood in the ground and they just bulldozed over it or whatever, so wood is rotting and where the termites are coming from is construction wood that's left on the lot. I understand bottles and stuff like that, but I think since wood has consequence that maybe we could be a little stricter on that because that would impact the possibility of damage to a home.
Mr. Laughlin stated Dan, I don't know if you have a contact such as the onsite supervisor that we could mention these problems to?
Mr. McCranie responded I have no interaction with them whatsoever.
Mr. Molineaux stated I'll deal with it.
Mr. Jentz stated there was talk on the Facebook page that somebody called about an alligator. You're probably not subscribed to that.
Mr. Laughlin stated no, staff tries to stay away from that.
Mr. Jentz stated there were folks up in arms about it and the main concern was that it is a small alligator, but I got to thinking about it and we're paying for those alligators every time somebody calls.
Mr. Laughlin stated no, it's part of the State.
Mr. Molineaux stated the trapper will come back to us and we approve them to come on property. We pulled one out the last week or the week before and we've got the guy  on property again today.
Mr. Jentz stated I'm a pro-alligator person so I'm saying we pretty much leave them
alone until they get to be about 20-feet long.
Mr. Laughlin stated sometimes they won't remove them if they're not threatening or they're small.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors'
Comments

Requests	and	Audience

Supervisor Requests

Mr. Harbison stated since the beginning of April, I had three people who were driving around the community looking at the houses and not at the little kids running in front of their cars. Two were realtors with clients, and one was just a couple asking where the marsh houses are and all this kind of stuff. I said well, there are wayfinding signs in the front, just look there because that's what was approved and of course, we have no wayfinding signs and we paid for something that we thought we were getting, but we weren't so I raise this again sarcastically, but at this point it's really getting to be an issue and as phase five comes online more it will be a bigger issue so I think we still need a wayfinding sign. Maybe just one here towards the beginning that says 'marsh places' or whatever with an arrow straight, and then another at the circle. Otherwise, people are going to be driving all over the place.
Mr. Laughlin stated usually the homebuilders put those up. We can talk with them and have them do it.
Mr. Molineaux stated also, the marsh front ones is Riverside Homes, and they have
local representation I believe across the street and that's where they generate their sales interest. They should be supervising people on the property. Not just saying zip over to Amelia Walk and see if you can find any. Ifl'm a salesperson with an active buyer, I'm  not letting them go until they buy.
Mr. Robinson stated they did have a website and they showed the sales office being
over here in the empty lot and they had a number, but they didn't have signage out.
Mr. Harbison stated Riverside is the worst. We bought a house in Amelia National through Riverside and had to cancel it because they just couldn't get their act together.
Mr. Molineaux stated they've sold 10 of the 31 lots.
Mr. Harbison stated anyway, these people are driving aimlessly so I just wanted to mention it.

Mr. Robinson stated I took some photographs, based on a conversation I had with Lennar Homes. A while back we paid Trim All to do some landscaping as you pass Champlain along Majestic Walk to Fall River Parkway. First, the question was is that CDD land, which it is and I'm talking about on both sides of Majestic Walk. I'm just showing you the picture of part that is landscaping, and the other part is basically sand and grass, from two different angles. The owner of that house asked if the CDD is going to maintain the entire space and I

didn't know the answer to that. I didn't know if they contacted you, Michael. I suggested they do that.
Mr. Molineaux stated I had a couple of owners contact me, The answer to which is if
the Board wants to invest money to landscape that piece of property that something you can discuss.
Mr. Robinson stated Gregg, obviously you can't see these pictures since they weren't in
the package, but Daniel can email them to you. I don't know if it was in the original plan for phase four. It's on both sides. You can see the part that was landscaped and then there's a fairly large space, almost the size of a lot that is not.
Mr. Kern stated I'm familiar. It's the entry to phase four and there are areas behind the
landscaping that was installed. We had some issues where the builders always like to use those common areas for staging so they had kind of torn it up and I asked them to clean it up at one point, but we could certainly consider doing more there. Is there a desire or something in mind that would be acceptable there?
Mr. Robinson responded I didn't have anything in mind other than understanding it. If
we're going to let it grow wild, at the minimum we must maintain it and cut it down.
Mr. Molineaux stated the main issue has been from the salespeople from the builders rather than from the homeowners because they consider that the entrance to phase four and phase five and they don't think it's very attractive. We could always put in some grasses out there and some more pine straw if you'd like.
Mr. Kern stated they can certainly have a landscape donation day.
Mr. Robinson stated pine straw will blow around because you can see that in one of the pictures that we did landscape on Champlain next to the house. You can see where it blew away and its bare sand. Maybe ifwe seed it. Don't we put seed down?
Mr. Kern responded actually it has been seeded. That's what the weeds are there. To
answer your question, yes, the CDD's property should be maintained. At a minimum it should be mowed. We could oversee it, we could plant Bahia, obviously that's more expensive. We could plant trees and shrubs, that's even more expensive. And then the irrigation to go along with those improvements. Seeding it is an easy add, but perhaps Michael if we could get with Trim All just to get a proposal to seed it and also make sure that we're mowing or maintaining what is there.

Mr. Robinson stated when I saw the Richmond American lots being mowed, again it was probably 50% sand. The grass was getting cut down, but it looked nice. I'm sure they're paying for it and they were obviously only working on lots that haven't been developed yet.

Mr. Kern stated I think we've gotten some of the bigger items resolved, recognizing we're heading into budget season I want to be sensitive of that, but these agendas seem to be getting lighter and lighter as the District winds down its capital projects. I just wanted to propose to the Board maybe a revised schedule. In many of my districts, at this point in the life cycle they will drop down to bimonthly or as Daniel could allude to, some meet qumterly, but I'm open to thoughts on that. We could always have a schedule and cancel as needed. Just a recommendation or suggestion that we look at reducing the frequency of the meetings.
Mr. Harbison stated I think that's a great goal and I think we could get there pretty quickly. Maybe an interim step is that Daniel and Courtney be aggressive in looking at the proposed agenda and deciding whether we want to meet.
Mr. Laughlin stated we will do that at times. I have a couple that are still in development with a low number of residents and they cancel a lot. These had some items we wanted to discuss. Gregg, we already have the adopted schedule for this year so I think the best way would be for now, just to cancel any meetings if they are light, and then as far as the budget tying in with the start of the next fiscal year, when we approve the schedule for next year we can maybe remove a couple if that's what the Board wants to do after any discussion.
Mr. Kern stated good point. I forgot about the adopted schedule so we will have the opportunity to revise that in the meantime. I will do the same to try to identify a light schedule in the interest of everybody's time and propose which ones we may be able to forgo.
Mr. Robinson stated last month we approved the phase five mailboxes and today we approved the requisition so ifwe don't meet regularly, I assume they haven't started any work because they haven't received the payment.
Mr. Laughlin stated requisitions can be ratified so in that case if it hadn't been recently received it would have been ratified. The engineer will go and look at the work and make sure the work is done and then it can get signed off ahead of time. Some of these need to be paid before the meeting so the payments can be made still and then it will be brought to the Board

for ratification. That would he the main consideration if we did look at canceling, is there anything needing to be approved and will it slow anything down, which we don't want to do.

Audience Comments
Resident Connie Philips stated I have a couple of items you guys mentioned landscaping in phase four and five and a question I had is we were very specific when we purchased our lot, that we had to have four trees on our lot. Apparently, that is not happening on the new lots, so I was wondering if that is a change because it was my understanding that someone told us since all these trees were tom down, four trees have been allocated for each lot going in. Was that just hogwash and you can put in any kind of trees that you want, or is there a stipulation for how many trees should go on a lot?
Mr. Laughlin responded that would be an HOA driven item. The District would have no decision or any influence as to what is done to resident's lots, whether it be the grass, the trees or the paint.
Ms. Philips stated it was supposedly the strategy of the community.
Mr. Laughlin stated I have no heard that before and nobody has told me that was part of a plan so whether it was the homebuilder or for certain lots, that would be separate from us.
Mr. Robinson stated I studied this when we were doing ARB. If you look at what I think is called the site survey plot map in your closing documents, it's usually a legal sized piece of paper, there is fine print which is a County stipulation or Ordinance that certain sized lots require X number of trees. Larger lots warrant different types of trees such as canopy trees like a maple or live oak. There's a whole list of trees that are authorized. Some of those trees on the County list are no longer considered viable, but they still might be on the HOA/ARB approved list because things change. They have one list and then the County adds or deletes stuff. I think it's a County ordinance.
Ms. Philips asked is someone following up on the number of trees that the County is requiring on the lot sizes?
Mr. Laughlin asked is it the homebuilder that implements that?
Mr. Robinson responded yes. The homebuilders have their landscaping options or plans, and they usually have set plans.

Mr. Harbison stated well with questions like this, who do you contact at the HOA between meetings?
Mr. Molineaux stated everybody contact Michael.
Mr. Harbison stated maybe put that in an email or something.
Ms. Philips stated the second one is an outstanding speeding question. Where are we at on that?
Mr. Laughlin responded we discussed different options such as speed bumps, flashing
signs or having the police patrol the area. The police would have to take care of any speeding issues. We looked at the cost of speed bumps and signs and they are very expensive so at this time they are deferring that. The speed bumps would require a traffic study, that would be submitted to the County and they would either approve or disapprove whether they can be installed. The costs were high, so no action is being taken right now.
Mr. Harbison stated it seems things are happening little by little. Leaving the community, I saw a police officer had pulled over a car and it was as all the people were coming in from work and driving past them and seeing that the police would ticket somebody.
Mr. Laughlin stated Michael has been in contact with the police department. He requests when they're available if they could come out here and patrol.
Ms. Philips stated I'm just concerned because now the kids are going to be out of school, and I'm just concerned they're going to be in the road.
Mr. Robinson stated as Daniel said, we did look at a number of things that were in the category of awareness such as speed limit signs, stop signs and speed bumps. They all have a cost associated with them. There's no cost associated with Michael calling up the police department and asking them to come patrol.
Mr. Molineaux stated I will say managing quite a number of properties other than Amelia Walk, the problem is the same in every community. It's not just Amelia Walk. It's just a social problem with people not leaving enough time to get where they want to go.
Ms. Philips stated and you see all of our vendors too. Just making them more aware would be helpful.
Mr. Robinson stated in the upcoming budget year, ifwe want to allocate money to hire
the Nassau County Sherrifrs office to say we want them onsite 30 hours a month and they pick the times, then we pay them the $50 an hour. This is a growing community here, as well as in

the area and what's not growing is the number of County officers. It's probably going in the opposite direction. That's where we're at is we're going to plead for services and if that doesn't work, we will have to pony up some dollars.
Ms. Philips stated I just think we should bring it up periodically to make sure we're getting results instead of just letting it go.
Mr. Robinson stated we do have two officers that live in the neighborhood and one of
them decided to park their car on the street so that helps.
Ms. Philips stated the next item I want to bring up is I know Michael brought up money for pressure washing. Where are we on that?
Mr. Molineaux stated we've been looking up proposals to have the pool deck and surrounding sidewalks pressure washed and that's another ongoing process. It's quite difficult to get people to come out and do anything right now because there are so many things delayed. We have a resident on prope1ty that I'm waiting on an estimate from and that will be to do the pool deck, the pool area, the clubhouse, and the surroundin_g areas so that's ongoing.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Other Business
There being none, the next item followed.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Balance Sheet & Income Statement
Assessment Receipts Schedule
Approval of Check Register
Mr. Laughlin stated we are about 83% collected for O&M assessments. The check register totals $44,461.72.

On MOTION by Mr. Robinson seconded by Mr. Jentz with all in favor the check register was approved.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Scheduled Meeting - May 18, 2021 at
2:00 p.m. at the Amelia Walk Amenity Center

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Jentz seconded by Mr. Harbison with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.